 |
COMPARISON OF TRANSDERMAL AND SUBCUTANEOUS TERIPARATIDE EFFECTS ON
MARKERS OF BONE TURNOVER AND SAFETY IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN Y.
Kenan 1, E. Kochba 1, M. Shahar 1, H. Gadasi
1, G. Levin 1, A. J. Foldes 2, S. Ish-Shalom
3,*, T. Matsumoto 4, R. Lindsay 5, C.
Christiansen 6, R. Neer 7
1TransPharma
Medical Ltd, Lod, 2Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center,
Jerusalem, 3Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit, Rambam Health Care Center,
Haifa, Israel, 4Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Sciences,
University of Tokushima Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan,
5Internal Medicine, Helen Hayes Hospital, West Haverstraw,
7Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States, 6Nordic
Bioscience, Herlev, Denmark Aims: TransPharma has developed a system for
transdermal (TD) delivery of teriparatide to alleviate the discomfort of
subcutaneous (SC) injections and to improve acceptance and compliance. The aim
was to compare the effects of TD 50, 80, and SC 20 µg teriparatide on
biochemical markers of bone turnover and safety.
Methods: A 3-month,
randomized, multicenter study was conducted in postmenopausal women with
osteoporosis (mean ± SD, age 65.1 ± 6.8 yr). The transdermal delivery of
teriparatide utilized radiofrequency ablation to create microchannels in the
skin, allowing rapid diffusion into the systemic circulation from a
subsequently-applied drug patch. The primary objective was percent change from
baseline to day 96 in procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP), a marker
of bone formation. Secondary objectives included changes from baseline in PINP
and CTX (C-terminal cross- linked telopeptide of type I collagen), a marker of
bone resorption, at days 48, 72, and 96, and safety monitoring of TD compared
with SC teriparatide.
Results: A total of 99/104 women (95.2%) completed
the study, a withdrawal rate 5%. Bone markers were measured in 33, 31, and 36
women in the TD 50, 80, and SC 20 µg groups, respectively. PINP and CTX
increased significantly from baseline (Table). No clinically significant
differences across study groups or time were observed for hypercalcemic,
dermatologic, or other adverse events (AEs). The number of patients with
predose and 4,6,8 hours postdose serum total calcium levels exceeding the upper
limit of normal in the TD50, TD80, and SC20 groups were 7 (20.6%), 9 (28.1%),
and 14 (38.9%), respectively. Four severe AEs were determined by investigators
to be unrelated to study treatment: 1/34 (2.9%, screening AE), 2/34 (5.9%),
1/36 (2.8%) in TD50, 80 and SC20 groups, respectively.
Table: Time course of
PINP and CTX median percent change from baseline by treatment group
|
|
Baseline
(Median µg/L)
|
Day 48 (%)
|
Day 72 (%)
|
Day 96 (%)
|
|
PINP
TD50
|
51.6
|
53‡
|
71‡
|
88‡c
|
|
TD80
|
43.4
|
83‡
|
122‡
|
172‡
|
|
SC20
|
47.0
|
83‡
|
88‡
|
150‡
|
|
CTX
TD50
|
0.432
|
29†a
|
34‡a
|
53‡b
|
|
TD80
|
0.351
|
72‡
|
99‡
|
116‡
|
|
SC20
|
0.392
|
11*a
|
34‡b
|
79‡
|
*P=0.0029, †P=0.0002, ‡P<0.0001 vs. baseline; aP<0.001; bP<0.01;
cP<0.05 vs. TD80
Conclusions: Teriparatide was well tolerated by all
groups. Transdermal teriparatide 50 and 80 demonstrated significant increases
in PINP and CTX, similar to subcutaneous 20 teriparatide.
Acknowledgement:
Funded by Eli Lilly and Company
|